E-readers, tablets and ipod touch
Is there anyone out there with experience of e-readers? My wife wants an e-reader for her birthday. We always take lots of books on holiday and with weight restrictions on cheaper European flights they can easily add up to 5 KG of our 20 KG per person allowance! The Kindle is an obvious starting point but we had a demostration yesterday and it did not feel very intuitive in its operation. She already has an iphone and was trying to use it as she would that. Another option could be to buy a cheaper tablet - she doesn't want anything as expensive as an ipad. I'd also wondered about getting my self an ipod touch - has anyone used that for reading books, or is the screen just too small for that?
Comments
My sister has a Nook that she travels quite extensively with and she really likes it. I've played with it and it was easy to navigate and appeared to be a sturdy build--hers, which she got at launch, has put on miles and still looks good.
My brother in law has a kindle which he likes.
1. It handles PDFs and you can also email any document to it in DOC or RTF and it converts it to a Kindle book and downloads it to the device. This for me is a good way to handle journal article reading; before a trip I download a bunch of articles I need to read and email them to my Kindle. I also edit two journals - nice to be able to forward submissions to my Kindle and have them all there to read when I have a little time. So for me document handling was actually more important than handling of novels; I basically don't buy books on it or read novels on it - I'm using it mostly for professional reading.
2. It has a different kind of screen to most of the others. It is not a backlit LCD-type screen - it emits no light, and has to be read in the same lighting conditions as paper (this also means it does not have glare in strong light). This means less eye strain - I did not want to add another device with a glowing screen to add to my collection; I spend too much time staring at them already. This also removed the temptation to read in bed after dark (though also removes that ability if you want it). This is a significant difference to the Nook, whichever way your preference goes.
3. Battery lasts a month (because the screen is not backlit). I like being able to go on a 10 day trip with long flights and not worry about running low, taking chargers or finding outlets. It's also VERY light and slim.
Navigation can be a little clunky but I'm used to it now. And some features that I at first found awkward I have come to realize are well-designed. For instance, there are two buttons on each edge of the screen; on both edges the top one is page back and the bottom one is page forward. For the first few weeks I would keep clicking on the left side of the screen for page back and the right side for page forward, which was more intuitive for me - but that was not how it worked. Then I was sitting one day with a drink in my hand on a plane and realized that the reason for the button arrangement is effortless one-handed operation. Now that I'm used to it it's great.
No real complaints so far - but I did have a very specific set of criteria. I am quite prepared to believe that the Nook is simpler for books; personally I didn't want the extra weight and glare or the lower battery life, & simplicity was not my optimal criterion.
You don't have to own a Kindle, you can download a software reader. I got a Kindle app for my Crackberry so I can read it on the train.
Craig
I have an ipod Touch and have used Apple's iBook to read free short stories and books in public domain. While it is a small screen, it's been useful to have some reading material on it for random down times. Reading hometown writer Zane Gray's Riders of the Purple Sage so I can say I've read at least one book by him. Not bad so far, though it has an odd anti-Mormon thing going on.
Craig