Are we dead yet?

15791011

Comments

  • @bluesboy, if by control you mean throwing full tanks of propane on a bonfire than, yeah. :-/
  • Just read the updated CEO post. Must be getting LOTS of cancellations. You don't do that much justifying unless something drastic is happening.
  • @mommio, maybe or it's because this whole mess has started to get bigger and bigger coverage like a NYT article.
  • It appears to be back up
  • Aaaaannnnnndddd, they're back.
  • Back and... first album checked was the same price as Amazon...
  • yep, now to wait for account to refresh, which somehow managed to be today
  • They're baaaack. Well the 'home page' is an oops, but the damage is done. Go take a look.

    Even though I've been out for almost 15 months I'm anxious to see what has been wrought.
  • Just read the updated CEO post. Must be getting LOTS of cancellations. You don't do that much justifying unless something drastic is happening.

    nah. my guess is that the statements by these two labels were distorted, and emusic had to address the issue more deeply. what the emusic ceo and what the labels said yesterday can't both be true, and since the statements were issued basically at the same time, they didn't address each other.
  • No mistakes found yet.
  • what you're seeing, i think, is some pretty hardball -- and frankly unseemly -- actions by these labels. here's why, in part: they protect the specifics of their deals, and the negotiations leading up to them, behind confidentiality walls, and of course, distributors like emusic can't pierce that confidentiality, if they hope to lure labels to emusic. but with these statements, the labels are using those terms (incl. confidentiality) as both sword and shield. emusic took a higher road in its initial statement, but now it feels compelled to respond.

    i don't think i'm making any shocking leaps of faith with this. i've seen similar tactics in all kinds of negotiations. the sentences are seemingly polite, but the label's statements are a fist hidden inside a velvet glove.
  • No mistakes found yet.

    This whole change is a mistake. Enjoy.
  • Hmm, already finding things that are cheaper at Amazon. Let the race for box sets begin!
  • @Daniel - With the way eMusic has been shown to handle business matters I would be absolutely shocked if it were as one-sided as you make it seem.
  • this just smacks of unsavory tactics i've seen in other contexts. i was instantly suspicious when i read the tenor and vibe of those (very similar) label statements.
  • but who knows, thom? you may be right.
  • Summun, Bukmun, Umyun -- Pharoah Sanders-- comes up at $6.49, higher than the old album pricing.
  • Kinks boxes that were 20 at 7d are over 40 here...
  • "Repurchase album ($5.99)"--great.
  • None of the boxes I looked up were mispriced, although they were all at better rates than Amazon by at least a few dollars. Some ECM's are under $5 if they aren't album priced.
  • The records on sale from New Amsterdam are coming up at $5.99.
  • edited November 2010
    Looking at an album I bought last night, instead of "re-download", it has a blue button that says "re-purchase album ($5.99)". Are free re-downloads gone?
  • Yeah I saw that redownload button too. Wonder if you can redownload them at all anymore?
  • err repurchase
  • Hmm might be a label thing. I just download Found Songs by Olafur Arnalds
    and it says retry download (free).
  • Check the new, November 18, 2010, Terms of Use.
  • are there hubs or new editorials to help sort all this stuff out?
  • Hey Katrina!

    Prices on old jazz aren't terrible...3 or 4 bucks w/o 10-min tracks. Otherwise 5.99-6.49 are prices you see a lot. Parts of Fantasy are gone (maybe??), many MIA from my S4L.

    Sets are maybe 25% less than on Amazon. Sorry, no big mistakes!
  • INA GRM is now album pricing.
  • are there hubs or new editorials to help sort all this stuff out?

    yep http://www.emusic.com/browse/editorial/ed/-edp/ed/0-0/0.html
Sign In or Register to comment.